Pt. No Point

September 16th, 2011

The staff here at Z Bird Tours decided to take the morning off yesterday for some birding.  Our destination was Pt. No Point for some seawatching (more or less) on Puget Sound.  It was a good morning with the highlights being at least six Parasitic Jaegers (four adults and two immatures) harassing the Bonaparte’s Gull flock only a few hundred feet offshore, 40 or more Common Terns, at least 25 Common Murres, and three Harlequin Ducks.  The skies were cloudy and it was quite dark, not good for photography, but nonetheless here are some shots (click on them for larger versions):

a flock of feeding Bonaparte's Gulls

a flock of feeding Bonaparte's Gulls

close-up of a Bonaparte's Gull

close-up of a Bonaparte's Gull

Common Tern and Bonaparte's Gull

Common Tern and Bonaparte's Gull

Common Tern

Common Tern

Common Tern

Common Tern

COTE15067

Common Tern

Parasitic Jaeger pursuing Bonaparte's Gull

Parasitic Jaeger pursuing Bonaparte's Gull

Parasitic Jaeger and a Bonaparte's Gull that's about to lose it's lunch

Parasitic Jaeger and a Bonaparte's Gull that's about to lose it's lunch

By the way, we ended the day with a trip to Tacoma to see the Black-tailed Gull that’s at the same location where there was one two years ago.  It’s likely the same bird.  We didn’t get any photos worth showing yesterday, but click here to see some from 2009.

The Z Bird Birding Blog Interview 4: Greg Miller, Hollywood superstar big year birder

July 29th, 2011
Greg_2010

Big time big year birder Greg Miller

Greg Miller first came to the attention of the American birding community with what was possibly the first “online” big year in 1998.  Then the release of Mark Obmascik’s 2004 book The Big Year, covering not only his big year but those of two others (Sandy Komito and Al Levantin), introduced him to an even wider audience. As regular readers of this blog know, a movie based on the book, starring Steve Martin, Jack Black, and Owen Wilson, is scheduled to be released on Oct 14.  Greg, an Ohio native who has been birding for over 50 years, got to work as an on-set consultant on the movie.  Recently I was able to talk to him about his big year, the book, and the movie:

Z Bird Birding Blog:  Writers have been notorious for getting things wrong about birding.  From your perspective, was the book The Big Year an accurate portrayal of you and your big year?

Greg Miller:  Yes.  I thought it was quite accurate–right down to the embarrassing details.

Z:  At the time you did the big year, what was the most important thing about it, the thing that really kept you going?  Was it the number, the planning, the thrill of the chase, something else?  And in hindsight, what was the most important thing you got from it?

GM: The curiosity of the whole concept drove me pretty hard.  I called it my Dream Year.  I wanted to know what it would be like to go to all the best birding spots in North America at the best times of the year–and to see how many species I’d end up with.  And wanting to keep my mind distracted and out of self-pity after the divorce was a constant source of energy, too.  I threw myself into the year early on.  I probably drove quite a bit harder than if I had been in more normal circumstances.  I actually started out the year with a goal of 600.  I did not even think that 700 was possible while working.  But that changed in mid-year.  And the most important thing I got from my dream year was a wonderful collection of memories from birding and travels and all the wonderful people I met along the way.

Z:  In the book, between a divorce and getting the “just friends” talk, you don’t have a lot of luck with the ladies.  Did being featured in a book help your luck?  Do you think being an inspiration for a major motion picture will improve it even more?

GM: Help my luck? Haha.  I wish.  No, I am still pretty much the epitome of single.  Will the movie change things?  I don’t know.

Z:  Attu played an important part in the book and everyone’s (you, Sandy Komito, and Al Levantin) big year.  Would you mind if I mention my company did a tour to Attu in 2010 and we’re looking for participants for our 2012 tour?

GM:  Sure.  That would be fine if you don’t mind me mentioning that I’m doing some guiding now.

Z: The book mentions that your dad punched a bear on the Alaska Highway.  Did that really happen?

GM: Yes.  Still a very amazing story to me.

Z:  I bet you’re known as “the big year guy” to a lot of people.  Do you think it’s your defining birding achievement?  Is there something else you’d rather be known for?

GM: Yes.  It is by far my biggest accomplishment.  I don’t mind being known for The Big Year, even though it was entirely a selfish pursuit, and it has nothing at all to do with science or conservation.  I am just hoping that the whole thing somehow translates into more people being aware of the wonderful world of birding.  I hope folks are curious enough to give birding a try.

Z: Quite a few serious big year attempts have ended up being documented in book form.  Which ones have you read, and what’s your favorite?

GM: I’ve read Vardaman’s book and Komito’s first book and of course, Kenn Kaufman’s Kingbird Highway.  The latter was easily my favorite and a source of inspiration throughout the year.

Z: A lot of big years are now documented online in blog form as they’re happening.  Before that it was through updates on a website, such as Lynn Barber in 2008 and Dan Sanders in 2005 (which just happened to be on your website, correct?).  But were you the first have an “online big year” in 1998?   I used to check out your website for rare bird reports back then and I remember marveling at your year list (it was larger than my life list at the time), but I can’t remember if you were updating it during the year or if you published your list after the fact.

GM:  I posted my list online with updates after trips during the year.  To my knowledge, I am the first to get help through posting my list online.  I got a lot of unsolicited help from many birders. Yes, I hosted Dan Sander’s big year updates in 2005.  (Yes, I hosted Dan Sander’s big year updates in 2005.)

Z:  OK, let’s talk about the movie: You were a consultant on the film, a job I know quite a few other birders wanted.  Did you have to lobby for that or did it just fall in your lap?

GM: It was both.  It fell into my lap as an opportunity.  I was personally recommended by the book author, Mark Obmascik.  And when I was given an offer (they could have told me I was going to do it for free), I took it without any bargaining.  I think it was probably the world’s most enviable birding job.

Z:  Did you work with any other consultants?  I know some of the optics guys gave notes on the script, but I don’t know how much they interacted with the actors or if they spent time on the set.

GM: No.  I didn’t work with any other consultants.  Well, that I know of.

Z: What did you actually do as a consultant?

GM: The folks at Fox sent me the movie script.  I went through the entire document and made comments and recommendations about every bird mentioned in the document.  Whether or not all those changes were made is entirely up to the director’s discretion.  I was on the movie set and got to watch filming on a daily basis.  I was consulted a number of times with various questions on-the-fly.  And sometimes it was quite challenging, too.  All-in-all though, it was a fabulous experience getting to see a movie being filmed and getting to meet the actors and actresses and all of the movie crew, too.

Z: Did you ever butt in and make a suggestion on your own when you thought something wasn’t right during filming?

GM: Yes.  A couple times I requested changes to how things were done.

Z:  it must be surreal to have a character in a movie based on you.  Is it surreal to be birding with Jack Black?

GM: It was so other-worldly that it was like a movie–something that didn’t really happen.  Jack Black and I went birding in a local Vancouver park.  Several other folks from the movie cast and crew went along.  It seems so far away now.  Although we didn’t see much, it was fun.

Z: What was it like birding with him?

GM: That first day was a little awkward for me.  I really felt out of place.  Jack was nice and seemed reasonably interested in birds, but more interested in me.  We spent a couple hours in a light rain.

So he was telling the truth! He really did bird with Jack Black.

So he was telling the truth! He really did bird with Jack Black.

Z: How awesome is the craft services table?

GM: Incredibly awesome!  Gourmet food in a truck.  No matter where we were shooting we could always count on fabulous food–catered on set.  I think I might weigh 800 lbs if I was an actor. haha.

Z:  Historically, Hollywood hasn’t depicted birders and birding in the most favorable light.  Has The Big Year finally gotten it right (other than perhaps some less-than-believable birds)?  Will birders be happy with the movie, or will we be embarrassed to admit to being a birder as we’re walking out of the theater?

GM: Umm.  I’m not sure how birders will take the movie.  I mean, after all, they are using me as one of their examples.  I am someone most people can laugh at and as a birder, might be pretty embarrassing as a representative of all birders.  Many of the movie cast and crew were very impressed with the story (the movie script).  Folks on the set called me “The Bird Guy” and would call me when they saw a bird overhead.  Most people I talked to had no idea there was such a world that existed.  I think the story had a good effect on the movie set as a whole.  And I hope it has the same effect on the general public.  But I am no expert in that kind of thing.

Z:  I’ve heard some of the binoculars used in the movie were purchased by the crew after filming.  Were there converts?

GM: I know of several people on set who went from never knowing about birding to buying field guides and binoculars to take up a hobby that was “the coolest thing ever”.  I am really hopeful.  But I am pretty biased.  I may be too optimistic.

Z: For the premiere, will you be walking the red carpet and who will you be wearing?

GM: On my last day on the set, the movie director shook my hand and said “Thanks for all your hard work.  See you at the premiere.”  So I have nothing in writing, but I do have some hope that I’ll get to go to the premiere.  Who will I be wearing?  ahhaa.  That’s a surprise.  Yeah.  That’s code for I have no idea.

Z: What are you up to now?  Any more big years in your future?  Are you trying to get hired as a birding consultant on other movies?

GM: I just started a short computer contract recently.  I am doing some bird guiding now, too. Maybe you’ve seen my new blog, too, www.gregmillerbirding.com. <–shameless plug.  haha.  [Z: Don’t worry, Greg.  This blog is full of shameless plugs.  Hey, have I mentioned my Ross’s Gull tour in October?

Are there any more big years?  Hmm.  Yes.  With lots of “ifs”.  Maxing out 5 credit cards is not one of the things that I want to do again.  Am I trying to get hired again as a birding consultant on other movies?  Well.  If I was asked again, I would certainly not turn it down.  I very much enjoyed the work and would do it again in a heartbeat.

Z: Thanks, Greg.  I hope the movie does well, and I look forward to seeing you on the cover of US Weekly and the National Enquirer at some point.

Barrow tour is a go

July 29th, 2011

The tour to Barrow, Alaska for Ross’s Gulls and other goodies is now confirmed to go.  It’s scheduled for Oct 5-9, but if you’re interested in arriving earlier and/or a shorter stay, please contact us to discuss other options.

Here are some photos from last year to whet your appetite:

ROGU08028

immature Ross's Gull

ROGU07971

adult Ross's Gull

ROGU07999

adult Ross's Gull

ROGU07998

adult Ross's Gull

ROGU07991

adult Ross's Gull

An adult Ivory Gull emerges from a snow squall

An adult Ivory Gull emerges from a snow squall

Arctic Fox

Arctic Fox

Fantasy Birding?

July 26th, 2011

Hi.  It’s been awhile since I last blogged, huh?  Z Bird World HQ moved a few months back, and there’s been a lot of work renovating the premises.  That, plus a tour, the normal requirements of life, my general disdain for blogging, etc. have kept me away, but I hope to get back to a slightly less irregular but still irregular publishing schedule.

Anyway, I just had a thought that it might be possible to set up a fantasy birding league based on eBird submissions.  (OK, yes, I know real birding is way better than fantasy birding.  No need to bring that up.)  I don’t have any real firm ideas about how it would work, but perhaps it could be a big year-style competition with each player picking a general location for each week of the year.  Any birds reported from that location for that week would get counted towards the player’s year list.

I’m sure the idea has problems.  For starters, I’m not sure how easy it would be to make something like this work, and maybe there isn’t that much interest in vicarious birding.  While fantasy baseball is huge, I found only one fantasy birding league in a quick internet search.  But maybe it would work.  Or maybe not.

Steve Martin (again) talks about The Big Year

May 4th, 2011

Steve Martin was on Conan last night and talked about The Big Year (starting around 6:54).  Actually, there’s not really any insights about the movie, and it’s a bit similar to this Letterman appearance, but even so, the entire segment is funny.  Watch the entire 12+ minutes; it’s worth it.  As always, Steve Martin brings something to a talk show rather than just sitting there and answering questions.  He’s the best late night show guest of all time.  My only complaint is that he claims there are seven ABA Checklist Codes.  How dare you, sir?!  There are only six!….Well, maybe he’s using a different system?

Interior Washington trip report

March 17th, 2011

Things have been busy around here.  Z Bird World HQ is moving in a few weeks, and we’ve been hard at work getting the new place ready, so a few things have fallen by the wayside, including getting a report on our January Interior Washington tour online.  But I’m trying to get back on track, and here’s a quick report:

We began birding on the morning of Jan 14.  Our first target was Gray Partridge, and we stopped at a grain elevator along Highway 2 east of Waterville.  No go on the Partridges, but we saw our first Rough-legged Hawk and a fly-by Prairie Falcon.  Moving on, we found Gray Partridges at our second stop, a grain elevator in the hamlet of Withrow.

Partridges hiding under the sage

Partridges hiding under the sage

Our next target was a Snowy Owl east of Mansfield.  We drove through Mansfield along the way, and found a big gathering of California Quail:

Just a portion of the covey

Just a portion of the covey

Moving on, the Snowy Owl was waiting for us when we got there.  We got good looks through the scope, but it was too far away for photos.  Maybe if you look very closely you can see it as a white speck in this photo:

The owl is out there on that ridge

The owl is out there on that ridge

Another target in the bag, we headed to Bridgeport State Park for another owl: Northern Saw-whet Owl.  It took a little while, but we found one hiding in a conifer.

watchingNSWO10483

Like the Snowy Owl, the Saw-whet wasn't exactly photo-cooperative

Like the Snowy Owl, the Saw-whet wasn't exactly photo-cooperative

By now, it was lunchtime, so we drove into Brewster to find a place to eat, along the way we past a small flock of Trumpeter Swans and a Harlan’s Hawk.  After lunch, we headed to Omak, our base for the next couple of days, by way of Cameron Lake Road, which wasn’t very birdy.

Day 2 of the tour was devoted to the Okanogan Highlands northeast of the Tonasket.  We started early to look for Great Gray Owl.  No luck with that, so we moved on to look for Sharp-tailed Grouse.  Along the way, I spotted a “softball with a tail” sitting on a utility wire — a Northern Pygmy-Owl.  Continuing the theme, this small owl was too far away for a decent photo, but we still had an awesome look at it in the scope as it sat in the sun, looking for breakfast.

We got to the Sharp-tailed Grouse spot, but the first birds we saw were a flock of Pine Grosbeaks.  Then we found the grouse a little further down the road.

Sharp-tailed Grouse

Sharp-tailed Grouse

We went back to Tonasket for lunch.  We took a side road near town and scored another target: Chukar.  There was a large group feeding around a corral, along with an even larger group of California Quail.

Chukar

Chukar

After lunch, we found a single Gray-crowned Rosy-Finch in a tree.  They’re normally around in large flocks at feeders, but the main feeding station wasn’t being maintained as in previous years.  While looking at the Rosy-Finch, Mike, one of the tour participants, spotted a Great Horned Owl sitting in the window of a barn near the Rosy-Finch tree.  Yep — again no photos of the owl.  It was dark and distant.  At dusk, we tried again for Great Gray Owl, but again, no success.

We started Day 3 back on Cameron Lake Road, but it was socked in with fog.  Not much to see except Mountain Chickadees and Pygmy Nuthatches.  Our next stop was Central Ferry Canyon Road.  Here we encountered a large flock of Bohemian Waxwings (the reason for coming here), plus several Great Blue Herons standing in the middle of a snowy field (always an odd sight no matter how many times you see it) and a male Varied Thrush.  From here, we headed back to Seattle and the end of the tour, with a few stops along the way for waterfowl and raptors.

The Z Bird Birding Blog Interview 3: Lynn Barber, big year birder

March 10th, 2011

The subject of today’s interrogation is big year birder and American Birding Association (ABA) board member Lynn Barber.  Birding since age 7, Lynn has done several big years, notably a record-breaking Texas big year in 2005 and an ABA big year in 2008 which she finished with 723 species, the third-best at the time (since surpassed by Bob Ake).  She wrote about her ABA big year in Extreme Birder: One Woman’s Big Year, scheduled to be released on March 19 by Texas A&M University Press. [The previous link goes to Amazon. Alternatively, the book is also available from Buteo Books as well as other outlets.] Lynn lives in Fort Worth, Texas and is a registered patent attorney.  In addition to being on the ABA board of directors, she’s a former president and current treasurer of the Fort Worth Audubon Society and president of the Texas Ornithological Society.

Lynn agreed to answer some questions about her big year and the ABA:

Z Bird Birding Blog: Why?

Lynn Barber: I assume you mean why on earth did I do an ABA big year. I tried to answer this question concisely in the introduction to the book, because most people just can’t imagine why someone would do such an obsessive-type thing. I could go on for pages about it, but probably it’s best to say it as I did in the book: “…a combination of just loving to bird and needing an excuse to do it nearly non-stop for a full year, the need to compete and see how well I could do, particularly against men, and the opportunity such a year provided to take pictures of birds and have adventures about which I could give talks, and maybe, about which I could write a book.” I did not realize that it would give me an opportunity to be interviewed!

Lynn Barber

Z: How did you prepare for your big year and when did you start?

LB: I started taking notes of where others had gone during their big years, e.g., from The Big Year book and from other accounts, about one-and-a-half years early, when I first got the idea to do such a thing. My preliminary investigations made me realize that I could not afford to do it as well as I wanted to, and for awhile I abandoned the entire idea. Then about six months before the year started (after my husband okayed our going into debt so far), I began again, making charts and graphs and calendars to figure out when to go for any bird that wasn’t easy to get. I used the ABA codes (1-6) to help me decide which birds to plan to chase, and which to be more relaxed about. The thing that worked best was to take a small calendar and paste post-it notes on it saying things like “go to California from [date] to [date] for X”, or “take NC pelagic this week”. Then when I got multiple overlapping post-it notes, I juggled things around to try to get everything and not miss anything. Some birds, like Saw-whet and Boreal Owls and Gray Partridges that are not rare, but are just hard to find, I sort of neglected in this process, and found myself scrambling for, and not always succeeding, as the year went on.

Z: You finished the year with 723 species.  In hindsight, do you think you could’ve done better?  From what I remember, there was a below-average number of vagrants in Alaska when you were there.

LB: If I had had unlimited funds, and no clients expecting me to do patent work for them, I definitely could have done better. There were days that I just birded and did not seek or chase birds needed for my big year. I “wasted” time doing my usual three Breeding Bird Surveys, where I never have found an unusual bird. There were one-day wonders I might have chased and might have found. I would have flown oftener and driven less. Alaska did not produce the way it should have, but there’s nothing I could have done about that. The year you choose to do a big year can make an astounding difference! My Texas big year (in 2005) was record-breaking because not only was I obsessed with doing it, but the birds came to Texas that year in record-breaking numbers. I do not think 2008 was a particularly good year to do an ABA big year. No way to know in advance.

Z: Birding can be exhausting, especially doing a big year.  Did it ever become a chore?

LB: Birding definitely became a chore when I faced, or was in the middle of, endless travel, or endless waiting. Or often, when I faced things (like pelagic trips or whitewater rafting) that scare me. I have to work at being patient and waiting was usually my biggest headache. But I have been a birder long enough to know that eventually the boring or the difficult things do end, and that most scary things aren’t really that bad if you want to do them badly enough.

Z: Did you ever think about quitting?

LB: Yes, of course, I thought about it. I think about a lot of things that I never do however. Every now and then I resisted the pull of going looking for birds and sort of slowed down a bit, when there were no known birds to chase, but I never seriously thought about quitting. I would probably not have quit on December 31st if I could have figured out a way to lengthen the year. ABA Big Two-Years anyone?

Z: What was your best experience during the year?

LB: That is impossible to say – too many ecstatic, surprisingly wonderful experiences. But when asked that question, what usually comes first to mind is my Spotted Owl quest for the year. The Spotted Owl is one of my favorite birds, and before my big year I had seen them most of the years I lived in Texas in the Guadalupe Mts. and once in Arizona. It did not occur to me that it might be a problem, and I even put a picture of one on my big year business cards that I handed out during my big year. But I could not find one in 2008! On my trips to Arizona I tried the usual spots – Miller and Scheelite Canyons. I went to the Texas Guadalupe Mts. Nada. And then at the end of the summer, there were repeated reports of two Spotted Owls in Miller Canyon. Day after day. So I drove out there, normally a two-day drive. Along the way, when I checked my emails there was a report of NOT finding any owls in Miller Canyon after some 10 or 12 straight days of finding one! I kept on, and when I arrived at Miller Canyon, one had not been seen for a couple of days. I tried anyway, without success. So I decided to abandon that chase and just go birding in Madera Canyon, a favorite spot of mine, and not think of owls. I had a lovely hike, adding a bird to my year list. On the way down, when I could get a cell phone signal, I found that I had three messages, all telling me that two Spotted Owls had been refound in Miller Canyon. After a wild drive back to Miller Canyon, a Fort Worth birder (Helen Nelson) staying at the lodge trudged up the mountain with me, and we located the owls!! They were barely above head level, dozing, photographic delights. I commemorated them with the cover painting on my book. A never-to-be-forgotten experience!

Barber_jkt

Z: And the worst experience?

LB: Probably another owl trip was my worst experience, although the Whooper Swan chase comes close [see below for more about that]. The late year trip to Ontario for a Boreal Owl (four had been reported) began with an injured plane return to DFW before we finally took off. When I got to the hamlet near the owl spot, I found that it had snowed with over-three-foot drifts at the owl area, and the one-mile road in to the site was not plowed. I struggled up the road, filling one of my boots with snow that became ice water for much of the trek. I did not find any little owls at all (but did have numerous Short-eared and Snowy Owls). The return plane, with us in it, sat at the Ontario airport for something like six hours in light snow, we were deplaned, reticketed on another plane, replaned, and sat some more. Awful trip, but the scenery was lovely.

Z: What did you get out of doing a big year, other than a book and the dubious honor of being interviewed by me?

LB: I think the best things I got out of doing the big year are the memories (trite, but true) and the satisfaction of actually having done it. Part of the latter includes the feeling of being unique, which I like. I am very happy about having a book published about it, primarily because it gives me an excuse to go out and talk to people about birds, which I love to do (it also turns out that it is fun to be interviewed). So, if I may, I’d like to include here that I hope some of the people who read this interview will check with their local birding groups to see if maybe they’d like to hear me come and entertain them with stories about my big year. [Lynn’s speaking schedule is listed on her home page.]

Z: Any advice for aspiring big yearists?

LB: I guess my advice depends on how serious they are. If they just want to see a lot of birds in one year, they can do as one person I met did – just park their camper in different good places in the selected geographic area, and move to different areas that have different birds periodically. That way you can probably get 550 or so in the ABA area. But if you want to get more birds, you just have to plan a lot, and travel a lot. A year moves along relentlessly. You can’t say “oops” and go back once spring migration has passed. And you need to figure out a way to both plan and be flexible, so that you can drop everything and chase a mega-rarity immediately. And you have to save a lot and/or collect credit cards and/or have friends to share the costs with. Of course, if the big year is a “green” big year, the cost (and the possible birds) goes down a lot, so the type of big year determines the type of advice needed.

Z: Here’s a philosophical question for you: How big does a year have to be to be called a big year?

LB: To me a “big year” is a year where you try to reach a goal of numbers of species seen that is difficult to do in one year in that geographic area. My threshold is low. My stated goal for 2008 was 650 species, which requires a dedicated effort at least, but deep in my heart my real goal was 700. Either would have been a big year in my view. Maybe even 600 would a big year, or at least a “little big year”. Maybe it really is any number that makes you (and others) say “wow!”. After all, you are doing it to impress at least yourself by doing something that you’ve never done, or attempted, before.

Z: Now the really important question: We birded together a few times during your big year.  Am I in the book?

LB: You are definitely in the book, and I am very grateful for your enthusiastic support and help in my big year. You appear (and are featured) in the discussion of the trek to Oregon for the Wood Sandpiper, in the account of our wonderful trip to Newfoundland in December which you scheduled so it fit within my year, and in the less happy account of our arduous, unsuccessful trek to Idaho for the vanished Whooper Swan. [Thanks, Lynn, for giving me the opportunity to link to one of my own tours. The next scheduled one is in Jan 2012, but if anyone wants to go now for all the rarities currently there – Black-tailed, Yellow-legged, and Slaty-backed Gulls, Common Snipe, etc. – please email me.]

Z: OK, now the second-most important question: Did you spell my name correctly?  It usually isn’t.  And I hope you didn’t mention that I couldn’t stay awake during the drive to Oregon and made you drive almost the entire way yourself overnight.  And that Whooper Swan?  Missing it wouldn’t have been so bad if it didn’t show up again just a few weeks after we chased it.  $&#^!

LB: I do believe, and I certainly do hope, that I spelled your name correctly. And yes, one of the very bad things about doing any serious chasing, such as a big year, is the fact that birds often just do not behave in an acceptable manner! The Whooper Swan is a very clear example of that. When the chase eventually succeeds (as with the Spotted Owl), you can forgive and forget the problems, but not with the swan. It irritates me still. And there are others from the big year too that still irritate me when I think of them – Boreal Owls and Connecticut Warblers being two not-so-rare examples.

Z: Let’s shift gears and talk about your involvement with the ABA. You weren’t on the board for very long before everything blew up last summer, right?  [For those unfamiliar with the story, the former president’s tenure ended unexpectedly.] Did you ever wake up one morning and think, “I didn’t sign up for this“?

LB: I did say exactly that: “I didn’t sign up for this”. And I did consider quitting because I definitely hate controversy, but I hung in there.

Z: The controversy of last summer certainly stirred up a lot of discussion about the ABA on the internet and seemed to renew interest in it.  Do you think it was actually a positive event for the ABA in the grand scheme of things?

LB: In the midst of the controversy, I would definitely have answered “no”, but now as things have calmed down a bit, it may well have served a good purpose as it brought the ABA to the attention of people who were unaware of it. And when the multitudes rejoiced in our new ABA leader on Facebook and Birdchat and elsewhere, many people may well have realized that the ABA did have potential. It did not hurt either that Drew Whelan in his Gulf reporting and work had an ABA affiliation. All in all, I am hopeful about the ABA and am glad that I am on the board.

Z: I’m sure you don’t want to step on new President/CEO Jeff Gordon’s toes, so we’ll keep in mind that you’re just one voice among many for these next questions: What do you see happening with the ABA in the future?  What would you like to see happen?

LB: I hope that ABA works very hard to work with and appeal to “normal” birders, not just cater to the professional, hardcore bird-people. I want it to offer bird-related events of a wide variety of types, from low-cost bird trips and meetings, to higher-end trips that are more expensive. In other words, I want it to be a birder’s organization, for all levels of birder, including young people and beginners, many of whom may continue to be birders and grow in their birding if given encouragement and education and opportunity by the ABA. I think the publications are critical in this regard. I also hope that Birder’s Exchange continues and grows as part of ABA.

Z: Anything else, either about the book or other stuff, that you would like to talk about?

LB: Although I have periodic guilty feelings about the non-greenness of my big year, I am so glad that I did it! I strongly recommend that anyone who is attracted to such an “extreme” endeavor give it serious consideration. Of all the things that I have done in my life, my ABA big year (and my Texas big year) are way up there at the top in having been personally fulfilling for me. So I say “go for it” if you want to and if you can.

Z: Thank you, Lynn.

Gray-headed Chickadee float trip

March 10th, 2011

We still need one or two to confirm our Gray-headed Chickadee float trip with Arctic Wild, and this is a trip I’d really like to see go, so I’m willing to offer a discount: mention you read about it here and I’ll give you $250 off!

Of all the resident bird species in North America north of Mexico, the Gray-headed Chickadee (a.k.a. Siberian Tit) is arguably the most difficult bird to see, though you’d be hard pressed to find someone who would actually argue that.  It has a large range in the Old World, inhabiting boreal regions from Scandinavia to eastern Siberia.  In the New World it inhabits only Alaska, Yukon, and the Northwest Territories.  What makes it so difficult to see in North America is that there are almost no roads within its limited range, so just getting to where the birds are is an undertaking.  It doesn’t help that it’s not common, even in the Old World, where it’s been declining throughout much of its range since the 1940s.

noatak1

The Gray-headed Chickadee’s preferred habitat is a bit of an enigma.  Various authors say it prefers spruce forest, others a mix of spruce and willow, or just willows.  Even in the Old World, it’s preferences vary from region to region.  In Alaska, it’s usually found near edges and areas of scattered vegetation (spruce, willow, or whatever) along rivers.  It’s a cavity nester often nesting in poplars.  (The Kugururok River has a good amount of willow scrub and poplars and appears to be good habitat.)

It looks similar to Boreal Chickadee, but it’s bigger and has a larger white cheek patch and paler flanks.  The Boreal Chickadee probably evolved from the Gray-headed during the Pleistocene glaciations, and it’s thought that the current New World population is actually the result of the Gray-headed re-entering North America following glaciations.  Competition with the Boreal Chickadee may restrict its range.

Despite their close relationship, there’s no record of the two species hybridizing (Gray-headed has been known to hybridize with Willow Tit in the Old World), which makes an encounter I had all the more frustrating: The Kelly Bar on the Noatak River had traditionally been the place to go to see the Gray-headed Chickadee, at least up until the mid-1990s.  In the summer of 1998, I visited the site intermittently to band birds.  I was expecting to see Gray-headeds, but two frustrating months went by with no sightings.  Finally in August I spotted a chickadee with large white cheek patches.  “Finally”, I thought, but then I noticed that it was a colorful bird, as far as chickadees go.  It’s flanks were more like a Boreal Chickadee, with warm tones.  I somewhat froze and didn’t look for other field marks, such as white edging on the wing feathers (which would indicate Gray-headed).  I was just trying to comprehend what I was seeing.  And then all too quickly, the bird was gone.  I saw it for only 30 seconds or less.  If I actually saw what I think I saw, it possibly could’ve been a hybrid.  But maybe it was a colorful Gray-headed, or a Boreal with more white in the cheek than normal, or maybe my eyes didn’t interpret things correctly.

That one bird has haunted me for years.  I’ve searched the internet trying to find a photo of a bird that looks like my memory but no luck.  From time to time, I still find myself wondering what it was.

The Z Bird Birding Blog Interview 2: Steven Siegel, “The Big Year” Videographer

March 6th, 2011

Steven Siegel has a “real job”.  He’s a pediatrician.  But he also shoots videos of birds.  I’m tempted to say it’s something he does in his off-time, but what started as a hobby turned into a video production business and led to him filming birds and consulting for The Big Year, the upcoming movie about three birders doing — you guessed it — a big year.  Based on the book of the same name,  it’s schedule to be released on Oct 14.

StevenSiegel

Steven started birding when he was 10.  A Northern Flicker is what sparked his interest.  He continued birding through college, raising a family, earning a Ph.D. in biochemistry and an M.D, a stint in genetics and immunology research, and starting a private practice in pediatric medicine.  His wife Wendy doesn’t keep a life list but has an uncanny ability to spot birds and mammals that no one else notices.  Steven’s two children, now adults, never showed much interest, but he’s happy to report his daughter and her children have recently discovered birding thanks to a Brown Creeper.

In the mid-90s, he noticed that there were few people shooting video of wildlife, particularly close-ups of birds, but there was a small demand for this footage, so he started Seiurus Video in 1996.  Regarding the choice of “Seiurus” as the name, he writes, “…because the videos were educational and the Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapillus) says “Teacher-teacher-teacher”.  Pretty lame but it seemed a good idea at the time.  For years people kept asking for “Serious Video” and couldn’t spell the name, no matter how they pronounced it. In 2010 I changed the company’s name to Raven on the Mountain Video Productions.” [He has a lot of useful tips for aspiring videographers, birding information, and other interesting stuff on his website, so check it out. You can also find his videos at YouTube and Vimeo.]

Let’s get into the interview [if you’re extremely impatient and need to know about The Big Year right away, that stuff starts with the fourth question]:

Z Bird Birding Blog: The first time I ran into you in Florida was about 10 years ago.  We were both chasing some rarity, and you stood out because you had a video camera. I don’t think I’ve ever seen you without a video camera. To this day, I don’t think I’ve ever encountered anyone else chasing a bird with a video-only rig.  What got you started in video?

Steven Siegel: I began in the 1980s. My initial intent was to be able to capture a Common Nighthawk at the bottom of its dive in close-up. I felt that doing it as a still would be very hard, but video, with its 30 frames per second just might work. When JVC came out with a camcorder that supported 35mm telezoom lenses, I decided to give it a try. I never did get a focused shot, but video turned out to be so much fun, and so revealing that I never gave it up.

Z: After working on the nighthawk video, did you have any other projects like that, a project where you go out and try to get something specific?

SS:  I frequently go after specific subjects.  Examples include lekking or booming chickens, and water-walking Western Grebes. I would love to make a project of video and sound of all the thrashers, but the desert ones sing in the winter…hard to get away.

Z: What does Raven on the Mountain Video Productions do?  Do you produce your own films or create clips for stock footage purposes?

SS: I do both.  I have provided video footage for numerous producers of documentaries, commercials, schools, government agencies, and TV programs.  Some of Seiurus’ productions have won contests and awards.  My longest video “Miles To Go Before They Sleep” has been shown at Audubon Society meetings and has been entered in The Palmetto Wildlife Film Festival in Beaufort, SC.  Specializing in close-ups of small birds, and flight footage, my list of species with useable video approaches 600.

Z: How did you get involved with “The Big Year”?

SS: I had been working with James Currie on the Birding Adventures TV show.  He was contacted by The Big Year and invited me to participate.

Z: What did you do on the movie?

SS:  I had many tasks with the movie.  The first was as a consultant.  The production staff had researched clips from stock footage studios and asked me to review them for suitability.  Most were foreign birds, totally wrong for this movie.  There were a few usable shots. I also reviewed shots being considered and tried to convince them that certain scenes were wrong.  The hordes of Black-capped Chickadees darkening the sky. The Henslow’s Sparrow pecking at a patch of dry ground.  The pair of American Woodcocks in a blue sky fly-by (from a suburban window). I think that most of these were canned, but I also believe that the Great Spotted Woodpecker in Oregon and the Pink-footed Goose in Colorado are going to make it. I still don’t understand how the screenwriter came up with this stuff.

In May, James Currie, Jeff Aderman [cameraman for Birding Adventures TV and other shows] and I went to High Island to film for the High Island part of the movie.  We missed the April 28 fallout of the decade, but I think they are going to computer generate the fallout anyway. Also in May I was in Washington State and B.C. (actually near where the movie was made) getting Evening Grosbeaks and other stuff.  In July I went to North Carolina to film female Ruby-throated Hummingbirds.  A female Ruby-throat is a major part of the plot line in the movie.  As soon as October arrived, I began shooting Wilson’s Snipe as a surrogate and model for a computer-generated Pin-tail Snipe in an Attu sequence.

In addition, they were also interested in a lot of stock footage.  A family of Mottled Ducks comes to mind.  I am still on call in case they need anything else, but my understanding is that the director has decided to emphasize more people, less birds.

Z: Do you think birders will be depicted favorably or can we  expect to see a lot of the typical stereotypes?

SS: Depending on how old you are, you may remember the birdwatchers of TV: Jane Hathaway, Pamela Livingstone, Mr. Peepers, all harmless eccentrics. The birders in the movie are nothing like that. Steve Martin is a hard-driving but burned out executive.  Jack Black is an overworked, impecunious computer programmer. His is the love interest.  Owen Wilson is a general contractor.  [ed. note: the movie isn't a strict adaptation of the book.  The characters are only based on the ones in the book.  They aren't identified as Greg, Al, and Sandy.]  What they have in common is a passion to compete…in birding, especially Wilson, and the three of them will amass huge lists by the end of the movie.  We had several discussions about how birders were going into this movie expecting to see a bunch of boy-scout suited, pith-helmeted old people running around waving their hands at Yellow-bellied Sapsuckers. I told them that such an approach would doom the movie. From what I have seen, there is nothing like that.

There may be a briefly embarrassing character who whistles a bird call here or there, but hey, that’s real, too. I saw part of myself and my friends in several of the scenes.  There has been a genuine effort to portray birding and birders accurately.  The actors were even coached in birding jargon and how to use binoculars naturally.  I hope my efforts to get them to show a bird in the binoculars in a circular field instead of a figure eight was successful. Time will tell.

Z:  What was it like working with the production staff?  Did you have face-to-face meetings or just send them notes?  And were they initially resistant to the changes you recommended?

SS: I enjoyed working with the production staff, mostly because I learned a ****load of stuff about codecs, formats, and computer animation. That was from the editing crew right here in Miami.  My main contact otherwise was Jeffrey Harlacker, in charge of post production. We bantered a lot mostly by phone, once in person, about birds.  I saw him go from clueless to rather facile on the subject. Jeffrey was usually receptive.  It turns out that the director is Caesar in a movie.  Any suggestion I made had to be run by him.  There were so many wholesale changes made in this movie over time that one’s suggestions were as often as not swamped out when complete scenes were changed or cut.

One impression I was left with is that the number of employees and consultants on a movie is huge. Very often they are working on different platforms (one guy editing on Final Cut Pro, another on Avid, for example) and they can’t cross-communicate. As a result a piece of film that needs to be processed by multiple people gets hung up for lack of a cable, or “my computer can’t read this”.

They prepare painfully detailed daily schedules and instructions for the shooting crews and actors, but leave the post-production guys to their own devices. You work in a fog. Would I do this as full-time job?  In a heartbeat.

Z: The editing crew was in Miami — was that a local production company or did they send a crew to be near you?

SS:  The director just happens to live in Miami.  That’s why the edit crew was here. They normally live in New York.

Z: I’m sure some of the readers will be interested in the technical aspects of filming.  What equipment did you use, and was this your normal rig or did you get to upgrade?

SS:  I shoot a Canon XLH-1.  This and the Sony PMW EX-3, new to me, were the camcorders used. These are both medium-sized, professional camcorders, larger than the ones most people have at home, but smaller than the big Nightly News machines. The film people preferred the Sony, which we rented.  I shot on a tripod with super telezooms (which both these cameras accept). Jeff Aderman shot wide, shoulder mounted, with the camcorder’s standard lens.  Shooting  birds is easy.  The problems come afterward.  Movie folks are used to film, and hold everything to its standard. What looks beautiful on video (where the biggest screen it will go on is maybe 50 inches across, and usually just a computer monitor) may be inadequate for a movie theater.  There was much anguish over blowing up videos for a movie.

Z: Your name is going to be in the credits of a big-time movie.  Have you thought about that? Did you ever think that would happen?

SS: Of course I salivate over seeing my name in the credits of a major motion picture. More, though, I want to be able to say that my name is in the credits of a major motion picture. The credits go by so fast that no one sees them, and I know they will misspell Siegel. Nice bragging rights, though. No I never thought it would happen, but with my new knowledge and updated skills, I hope it will happen again.

Z: Is there anything else you’d like to share with the readers?

SS: The producers have taken a huge gamble, in birders’ interests, in making this movie.  Although everyone knows that major motion pictures can be made with video (like The Blair Witch Project), this may be the first time that one has depended extensively on video images of creatures as small as songbirds. Blowing these up to the size of the big screen and still making them look good is a technically daunting and expensive proposition. If this movie is successful, we birders may see more. If not, it’s back to obscurity.

The purists among us are going to see this movie and nitpick it apart.  There are going to be errors that even an expert birder couldn’t prevent. Keep in mind that this isn’t Winged Migration. It’s a comedy.  For the sake of the story, for the sake of audience interest, liberties had to be taken.  They tried really hard to be authentic and for the most part I think you will find that they were. They tried really hard to be respectful to the environment, even having a consultant on site when there was any risk of damaging sensitive locations. Although I haven’t seen but a few brief clips, I believe that viewers will see people, and recognize situations they know, and get a laugh out of this film that will go right over the heads of nonbirders.

Go into this film intending to critique it like a new field guide reviewed in Birding and you will be disappointed.  Go into it like you were out to have a good time with birding friends, and I think you will come out smiling.

Z: Thanks for taking time to answer my questions.  I hope you get to work on some more movies like The Big Year, perhaps The Big Year 2: The Big Day.

The Big Year gets a release date

January 18th, 2011

Collider.com and others (for example, this site) are reporting that The Big Year will be released on October 14, 2011.  Alas, the rumor of a July 4th release was just that, a rumor.  It looks like it will be going up against the remake of Footloose and The Three Musketeers, but there doesn’t appear to be any other comedies scheduled for release at that time.  Of course, all of this may change between then and now.